{"id":485,"date":"2018-02-15T08:45:40","date_gmt":"2018-02-15T14:45:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogofnotesite.wpengine.com\/?p=485"},"modified":"2019-07-03T23:42:40","modified_gmt":"2019-07-04T04:42:40","slug":"larry-nassars-sentencing-hearing-the-role-of-victim-impact-statements","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?p=485","title":{"rendered":"Larry Nassar’s Sentencing Hearing & the Role of Victim Impact Statements"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"
The Hon. Rosemarie E. Aquilina presided for the victim impact statements.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

On January 24, 2018, former USA Gymnastics doctor Larry Nassar was sentenced to up to 175 years<\/a> in prison for sexually abusing scores of athletes he treated over the course of several years. Nassar\u2019s sentencing hearing<\/a> has drawn nationwide attention to the role of victim impact statements<\/a> in our judicial system. Generally, victim impact statements involve written or oral communication from a crime victim about how the crime has affected them. All fifty states allow victim impact statements at some point in the sentencing process, and judges often take those statements into consideration along with other factors when determining the sentence.<\/p>\n

Nassar pled guilty to seven counts of first-degree criminal sexual misconduct and admitted to using his position as an entrusted doctor to abuse athletes who came to him seeking medical treatment. As part of the plea agreement, Nassar agreed to have his victims provide statements in court. Judge Rosemarie Aquilina allowed all 156 victims to present<\/a> their statements in court, with Larry Nassar seated in the witness stand before them.<\/p>\n

The role of victim impact statements in both serving justice and empowering the victim has been widely debated. While some strongly believe<\/a> that the practice enables previously silenced victims to share their stories and have their voices heard, others point out<\/a> that such statements could cause a judge or jury to use subjective harm to the victim as a proxy for the defendant\u2019s culpability, rather than looking at the weight of the evidence.<\/p>\n

The Nassar hearing, however, is unique for two reasons. First, just prior to the sentencing hearing on the sexual assault charges, Nassar had already been sentenced to sixty years in prison on federal child pornography charges. He had no prospects for escaping a substantial amount of time in prison, irrespective of the result in the sexual assault case. In fact, it was clear that he would be spending the remainder of his years in prison<\/a> no matter what. Second, over 150 victims came forward to present their statements and expose the horrific realities of Nassar\u2019s behavior while the nation watched. Judge Aquilina\u2019s decision to allow each victim to speak was not unanimously lauded. Fellow Ingham County Circuit Judge William Collette remarked<\/a>, \u201cDoing justice is one thing. It is not a judge\u2019s function to get people healed.\u201d<\/p>\n

Judge Collette may be right that it is not a judge’s job to heal people, but the inclusion of victims in the Nassar case has also served a broader purpose of uncovering the truth. In a case where formal witness testimony was precluded by a plea agreement, the presentation of victim impact statements by women who were ready and able to do so publicly have exposed Larry Nassar as who he really is\u2014a man with a decades-long history of sexual misconduct, who was lucky enough to find himself working among a cohort of negligent, if not equally reprehensible adults<\/a> who tacitly condoned or defended his criminal behavior at the expense of innocent women and children.<\/p>\n

As law students and lawyers, we often discuss the imperative of finding the truth. In Larry Nassar\u2019s case, his guilty plea alone would fail to expose the whole truth. As one victim, Rachael Denhollander, said in her statement<\/a>, \u201c[T]he truth about what Larry has done must be realized to its fullest depth if justice is to ever be served.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On January 24, 2018, former USA Gymnastics doctor Larry Nassar was sentenced to up to 175 years in prison for sexually abusing scores of athletes he treated over the course of several years. Nassar\u2019s sentencing hearing has drawn nationwide attention to the role of victim impact statements in our judicial system. Generally, victim impact statements involve written or oral communication from a crime victim about how the crime has affected them. All fifty states allow victim impact statements at some…<\/p>\n

Read More Read More<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":28,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"BLOG: \"Larry Nassar's Sentencing Hearing & the Role of Victim Impact Statements\" by Khadija Lalani, exploring differences among judges about the proper use of victim impact statements.","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[55],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-485","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-board-member-contribution"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9jSvD-7P","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":167,"url":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?p=167","url_meta":{"origin":485,"position":0},"title":"Leveraging Social Science Evidence in the Courts Today","author":"Meredith McBride","date":"November 17, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"United States District Judges Edmond E. Chang, Sara L. Ellis, and Virginia M. Kendall comprised the fourth and final panel of the Northwestern University Law Review\u2019s October 20, 2017 symposium, \u201c\u2018A Fear of Too Much Justice\u2019?: Equal Protection and the Social Sciences 30 Years after McCleskey v. Kemp,\"\u00a0engaging questions of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "On Campus"","block_context":{"text":"On Campus","link":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?cat=17"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogofnotesite.wpengine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/IMG_0607-1-1024x509.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogofnotesite.wpengine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/IMG_0607-1-1024x509.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogofnotesite.wpengine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/IMG_0607-1-1024x509.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":63,"url":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?p=63","url_meta":{"origin":485,"position":1},"title":"A Fear of Too Much (Criminal) Justice: Social Science Evidence and the Tension Between Reform and Transformation in the Criminal Justice System","author":"Hillary Chutter-Ames","date":"October 30, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"McCleskey v. Kemp\u00a0(1987) was an example of \u201cgood-enough-for-black-people kind of justice.\u201d At least, that was how Professor Paul Butler (Georgetown) characterized the seminal death penalty case under discussion at the recent Northwestern University Law Review Symposium, A Fear of Too Much Justice?: Equal Protection and the Social Sciences 30 Years\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Symposium"","block_context":{"text":"Symposium","link":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?cat=14"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogofnotesite.wpengine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/IMG_0599-1024x610.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogofnotesite.wpengine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/IMG_0599-1024x610.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogofnotesite.wpengine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/IMG_0599-1024x610.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1445,"url":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?p=1445","url_meta":{"origin":485,"position":2},"title":"True Causes of Racial Disparities in the COVID-19 Pandemic","author":"Teri Dobbins Baxter","date":"May 29, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"To the shock of those unfamiliar with racial health disparities in the United States, African Americans (and other racial minorities) have been infected with, and died from, COVID-19 at a much higher rate than white Americans. The explanation given by Dr. Anthony Fauci (Director of the National Institute of Allergy\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "COVID-19"","block_context":{"text":"COVID-19","link":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?cat=122"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1135,"url":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?p=1135","url_meta":{"origin":485,"position":3},"title":"Is it Only a Crime? Domestic Violence, Vulnerability, and the Carceral State","author":"Malinda Seymore","date":"February 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"The following piece is a part of NULR of Note's \u201cBring Back The \u201890s\u201d initiative, aimed at exploring the evolution of legal thinking over the past three decades. For more, click here. Photo by\u00a0Emiliano Bar\u00a0on\u00a0Unsplash When I wrote\u00a0Isn\u2019t It a Crime: Feminist Perspectives on Spousal Immunity and Spousal Violence\u00a0for the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Bring Back the '90s"","block_context":{"text":"Bring Back the '90s","link":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?cat=56"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/emiliano-bar-PaKHbtTDqt0-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/emiliano-bar-PaKHbtTDqt0-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/emiliano-bar-PaKHbtTDqt0-unsplash.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/emiliano-bar-PaKHbtTDqt0-unsplash.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/emiliano-bar-PaKHbtTDqt0-unsplash.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/emiliano-bar-PaKHbtTDqt0-unsplash.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":698,"url":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?p=698","url_meta":{"origin":485,"position":4},"title":"Software Innovation After Alice","author":"Christopher Shoup","date":"March 20, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court decided Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int\u2019l in June 2014, a decision which greatly restricted the scope of patentability for software innovations. The case concerned an electronic escrow service\u2014a computer program that acted as a \u201cthird party intermediary\u201d between two negotiating parties and ensured that both would\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Board member contribution"","block_context":{"text":"Board member contribution","link":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?cat=55"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogofnotesite.wpengine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/7981121605_3387094560_k-1024x680.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogofnotesite.wpengine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/7981121605_3387094560_k-1024x680.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogofnotesite.wpengine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/7981121605_3387094560_k-1024x680.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1410,"url":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?p=1410","url_meta":{"origin":485,"position":5},"title":"Multi-Level Marketer Social Media Presence During COVID-19 Provokes FTC","author":"Erik Birnel","date":"May 16, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"MLMs and Why They Matter DoTERRA essential oils and other multi-level marketers (MLMs) are in trouble. Their social media presence during the COVID-19 crisis provoked Federal Trade Commission (FTC) enforcement action in late April. But what exactly are MLMs and why are they particularly relevant during the COVID-19 crisis? MLMs\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "COVID-19"","block_context":{"text":"COVID-19","link":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?cat=122"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/485","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/28"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=485"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/485\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=485"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=485"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=485"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}