{"id":2730,"date":"2022-11-09T18:06:57","date_gmt":"2022-11-10T00:06:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?p=2730"},"modified":"2024-01-23T17:30:59","modified_gmt":"2024-01-23T23:30:59","slug":"the-new-noncompete-the-training-repayment-agreement-provision-trap-as-a-scheme-to-retain-workers-through-debt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?p=2730","title":{"rendered":"The New Noncompete: The Training Repayment Agreement Provision (TRAP) as a Scheme to Retain Workers through Debt"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

There\u2019s a good chance that, over the past couple of years, you\u2019ve considered quitting your job. One thought that probably crossed your mind was whether you could afford it. But what if you took the plunge, as tens of millions of workers<\/a> have done since the beginning of the pandemic? You may have planned for other ways to cover housing costs, food, medical needs, ongoing loan payments, and perhaps childcare. But imagine, after your careful planning, receiving a letter that says you owe your former boss thousands of dollars for quitting. That\u2019s exactly what happened to BreAnn Scally after leaving her grooming job at a Salinas, California PetSmart<\/a> because of unsustainable working conditions. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scally was bound by a Training Repayment Agreement Provision <\/a>(TRAP) that required her to repay the cost of her training if her job ended within two years. In Scally\u2019s case<\/a>, she learned that PetSmart was going after her for $5,500 for attending its \u201cGrooming Academy.\u201d Yet, the so-called Academy provided little useful training and quickly sent her out to groom pets for paying customers, all while she struggled for attention from trainers. Grooming Academy \u201cgraduates\u201d often earn little more than the minimum wage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Recently, many student loan borrowers celebrated President Biden\u2019s partial cancellation of traditional student debt<\/a>. But TRAPs are another and perhaps more nefarious form of student debt, called \u201cshadow\u201d student debt<\/a>. Shadow student debt is less regulated than traditional student loans but is still imposed in exchange for purported education and training. Shadow student debt products like TRAPs may extend to industries that represent more than a third of private sector workers, according to a July 2022 report<\/a>. Indeed, a 2020 Cornell Survey Research Institute survey found that nearly 10 percent<\/a> of U.S. workers worked under TRAPs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Millions of workers, many of whom are low-wage or low-middle wage workers and disproportionately people of color, are likely bound by TRAPs<\/a>. These include workers whom we relied on during the worst phases of the pandemic\u2014nurses and EMTs, retail workers and truck drivers\u2014and whose services are in the highest demand now<\/a>. The TRAP acronym doesn\u2019t belie their situation: many of them could command better pay by going to another employer but feel trapped in their current jobs. And that\u2019s precisely the purpose: at least one trade association<\/a> has counseled its members to consider TRAPs as a way to keep workers from leaving. These contracts can be so one-sided that at least one judge has likened TRAPs to indentured servitude<\/a>. Moreover, many workers bound by TRAPs are simultaneously bound by other debt products disproportionately targeted at communities of color<\/a>, such as \u201cbuy now, pay later\u201d schemes, payday loans, and salary cash advances. Indeed, Scally, a Black woman, already had student loans and other debt before the TRAP debt surfaced.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Until now, civil rights groups, unions, government agencies, and academics have focused scrutiny on noncompete agreements that prevent<\/a> workers from working for competitors. This criticism is deserved, and a number of state governments have passed statutes<\/a> limiting traditional noncompete agreements or banning them outright, such as California\u2019s ban. But firms seeking to keep wages down without causing mass exodus are already using TRAPs as workarounds<\/a> to noncompetes because TRAPs seem more justifiable but have the same end result. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

But TRAPs can be worse for some low-wage workers than traditional noncompete agreements<\/a>. Imagine fast-food workers who cannot work for a competitor fast food chain because of a traditional noncompete\u2014the workers could easily find a job in another industry. But if those workers are indebted to their employer under a TRAP, they must pay no matter where they work next, or even if they do not work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Worker advocacy groups like the National Employment Law Project have highlighted<\/a> the growing use of TRAPs. In 2022, a nurses\u2019 union found that almost 45 percent of surveyed nurses with one to five years\u2019 experience<\/a> have been bound by TRAPs, compared to just a quarter of longer-serving nurses with 11 to 20 years\u2019 experience.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Government agencies have also taken notice. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has sought workers<\/a> to share their experiences with employer-driven debt, signaling the possibility that it may rightfully view TRAPs and other forms of shadow student debt as extensions of credit to workers. That is, if firms decide to provide training services for a cost, workers become consumers<\/a> of those services and are covered by consumer protection laws and the agencies that enforce them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

BreAnn Scally is bringing this argument to PetSmart. In July 2022, she filed a first-of-its-kind<\/a> lawsuit in California arguing that PetSmart\u2019s TRAP is invalid under California consumer, education, and employment laws. The complaint presents a Catch-22 for PetSmart if it attempts to avoid liability under both employment laws and consumer laws. On one hand, employment laws prohibit employers from charging employees for training that benefits the employer. So, if the Grooming Academy is primarily for PetSmart’s benefit<\/em>, then the TRAP would violate California employment law<\/a> by requiring workers to pay for the training. On the other hand, consumer laws<\/a> protect borrowers of loans for personal use, and education laws<\/a> require that any post-secondary education provider obtain a license. Therefore, if the Grooming Academy is primarily for the workers\u2019 benefit<\/em>, then the TRAP terms would violate California consumer laws by unfairly and deceptively indebting workers and would violate California education laws because the Grooming Academy was unlicensed. PetSmart can take its pick, but the suit\u2019s innovative claims hold the employer accountable for attempting to have its cake and eat it, too. For this reason, Scally\u2019s suit has a strong chance of success.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Stories like Scally\u2019s should put pressure on agencies like the CFPB to rein in TRAPs and ideally ban them altogether, as\u00a0California<\/a>\u00a0has recently done for hospital health care workers. By offering debt-inducing services like training to workers, employers have become creditors and have thus waded into the jurisdiction of the CFPB and other agencies that protect consumer borrowers. In the meantime, if you decide to take the plunge and leave your job, make sure to read the fine print: there may be a TRAP or another form of shadow debt standing in the way.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jonathan F. Harris (he\/him\/\u00e9l) is an associate professor of law at LMU Loyola Law School Los Angeles. He writes and speaks on work law and contracts, worker mobility, and workforce development. He thanks\u00a0Northwestern University Law Review Online\u00a0Editor-in-Chief Taylor Nchako and\u00a0Online\u00a0Articles Editor Ella Chochrek for their thoughtful and patient editing. This publication was prepared with support from the Student Loan Law Initiative, a project of the University of California, Irvine School of Law and the Student Borrower Protection Center program of the Shared Ascent Fund.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

There\u2019s a good chance that, over the past couple of years, you\u2019ve considered quitting your job. One thought that probably crossed your mind was whether you could afford it. But what if you took the plunge, as tens of millions of workers have done since the beginning of the pandemic? You may have planned for other ways to cover housing costs, food, medical needs, ongoing loan payments, and perhaps childcare. But imagine, after your careful planning, receiving a letter that says you…<\/p>\n

Read More Read More<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":178,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2730","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9jSvD-I2","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1146,"url":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?p=1146","url_meta":{"origin":2730,"position":0},"title":"Trade Scholarship Must Evolve","author":"Philip Nichols","date":"February 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"The following piece is a part of NULR of Note's \u201cBring Back The \u201890s\u201d initiative, aimed at exploring the evolution of legal thinking over the past three decades. For more, click here. Photo by\u00a0chuttersnap\u00a0on\u00a0Unsplash Twenty-four years ago, when I wrote Trade Without Values, the international trade regime provoked substantial scholarly\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Bring Back the '90s"","block_context":{"text":"Bring Back the '90s","link":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?cat=56"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/chuttersnap-kyCNGGKCvyw-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/chuttersnap-kyCNGGKCvyw-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/chuttersnap-kyCNGGKCvyw-unsplash.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/chuttersnap-kyCNGGKCvyw-unsplash.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/chuttersnap-kyCNGGKCvyw-unsplash.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/chuttersnap-kyCNGGKCvyw-unsplash.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1364,"url":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?p=1364","url_meta":{"origin":2730,"position":1},"title":"Vote-by-Mail Can Save Our Democracy, But Reforms Are Needed","author":"Sonni Waknin, Michael Cohen, Chad W. Dunn, & Matt A. Barreto","date":"April 30, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"As the world turns to strategies to stave off the worst effects of the novel coronavirus, now is the time to double down on our commitment to democracy. States around the country are pushing back primary and runoff elections in the hope that, if held at a later time, election\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Congressional Responses"","block_context":{"text":"Congressional Responses","link":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?cat=160"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1373,"url":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?p=1373","url_meta":{"origin":2730,"position":2},"title":"Protecting Our Health Care Providers from Liability in a Pandemic","author":"Sharona Hoffman","date":"May 3, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"While COVID-19 creates profound medical concerns for health care providers, it also creates fear of potential lawsuits. Clinicians are forced to ration scarce resources, such as ventilators, when there is an inadequate supply. Medical professionals describe chaos in hospitals that makes it extremely difficult to treat all patients appropriately. Patients\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "COVID-19"","block_context":{"text":"COVID-19","link":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?cat=122"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1455,"url":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?p=1455","url_meta":{"origin":2730,"position":3},"title":"Experimental Drug Could Curb Emerging COVID Mental Health Crisis","author":"Mason Marks, MD, JD","date":"June 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"As the COVID-19 pandemic evolves, experts warn it is triggering a national mental health crisis. Some say it could cause up to 75,000 U.S. deaths by suicide and drug overdose. Millions may experience lasting grief from losing loved ones, depression due to unemployment, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) from working\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Congressional Responses"","block_context":{"text":"Congressional Responses","link":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?cat=160"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":698,"url":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?p=698","url_meta":{"origin":2730,"position":4},"title":"Software Innovation After Alice","author":"Christopher Shoup","date":"March 20, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court decided Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int\u2019l in June 2014, a decision which greatly restricted the scope of patentability for software innovations. The case concerned an electronic escrow service\u2014a computer program that acted as a \u201cthird party intermediary\u201d between two negotiating parties and ensured that both would\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Board member contribution"","block_context":{"text":"Board member contribution","link":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?cat=55"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogofnotesite.wpengine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/7981121605_3387094560_k-1024x680.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogofnotesite.wpengine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/7981121605_3387094560_k-1024x680.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogofnotesite.wpengine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/7981121605_3387094560_k-1024x680.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1369,"url":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?p=1369","url_meta":{"origin":2730,"position":5},"title":"Essential but Excluded: Vending in the Time of Corona","author":"Joseph Pileri","date":"May 1, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Immigrants, those with legal status and those without, individuals returning from incarceration, and individuals with time-consuming childcare and other family obligations often look to start microenterprises like street vending to provide for themselves and their families. However, many municipalities in the United States apply a penal approach to street vending,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "COVID-19"","block_context":{"text":"COVID-19","link":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?cat=122"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2730","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/178"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2730"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2730\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2730"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2730"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2730"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}