{"id":1383,"date":"2020-05-05T10:21:49","date_gmt":"2020-05-05T15:21:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogofnotesite.wpengine.com\/?p=1383"},"modified":"2020-05-05T10:21:49","modified_gmt":"2020-05-05T15:21:49","slug":"covid-19-and-indian-country-a-legal-dispatch-from-the-navajo-nation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?p=1383","title":{"rendered":"COVID-19 and Indian Country: A Legal Dispatch from the Navajo Nation"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

There has been much press coverage<\/a> on the Navajo Nation\u2019s struggle to contain the spread of COVID-19 on its lands. As of May 2, 2020, the Nation has 2,373 confirmed cases, and more than seventy deaths from the virus<\/a>. These reports<\/a> have noted the practical impediments the Nation faces in responding to the pandemic, including a high population of people with pre-existing health problems, the lack of easy access to health care, and the significant number of families without running water<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Navajo Nation has issued several orders aimed at combating COVID-19. President Jonathan Nez and the Nation\u2019s Commission on Emergency Management declared a state of emergency<\/a> in early March. President Nez also issued Executive Orders<\/a> closing the government and the schools. The Nation\u2019s Health Command Center has issued several Public Health Emergency Orders<\/a> requiring all residents to stay at home, imposing night and weekend curfews, ordering all visitors to leave, closing all non-essential businesses, and mandating the use of masks in public. Finally, the Navajo Nation Council closed all Navajo Nation-owned roads to visitors and tourists<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What is less often discussed is the legal environment facing sovereign Indian nations, like the Navajo Nation, when responding to the pandemic. The Navajo Nation<\/a> is a sovereign government whose authority pre-exists the federal Constitution. The Nation has two ratified treaties with the United States\u2014from 1849<\/a> and 1868<\/a>\u2014which recognize and affirm the sovereignty of the Nation. Indian tribes possess the common attributes of governmental authority, including the power to issue public health orders<\/a>. Within their territory, they are the primary governments providing necessary services to tribal members and non-members alike, including combatting infectious diseases.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, the United States Supreme Court has purported to limit tribal authority in significant ways, classifying tribes not as full sovereigns but as \u201cDomestic Dependent Nations\u201d. <\/a> In Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe<\/em><\/a>, <\/em>the Court ruled tribes have no criminal authority over non-Indians. In Montana v. United States<\/em><\/a>, the Court limited tribal civil jurisdiction over non-members, presuming tribes have no authority, and required them to affirmatively prove one of two exceptions: (1) the tribe must show the non-member has a \u201cconsensual relationship\u201d with the tribe or a member, and that the tribe\u2019s regulatory action has a \u201cnexus\u201d<\/a> to that relationship or (2)  the tribe must show the non-member\u2019s actions would be \u201ccatastrophic\u201d<\/a> to the existence of the tribe.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Navajo Nation and other tribes have pushed back on these limitations, arguing their inherent power to exclude non-members from their lands means they do not have to fulfill the two Montana <\/em>exceptions<\/a>. A line of cases<\/a> in the Ninth Circuit holds tribes may regulate non-members on tribally-owned lands free from Montana\u2019s <\/em>restrictions. The result is a split between the Ninth Circuit and other circuits over whether the right to exclude, by itself, allows regulation of non-members, with other<\/a> circuits<\/a> requiring tribes to fulfill one of the two exceptions. Despite multiple<\/a> attempts<\/a> to bring the issue before the Supreme Court<\/a>, the split remains today.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This legal complexity has immediate practical consequences for tribes\u2019 ability to control the spread of COVID-19. Many tribes have significant numbers of non-members residing within their territory, employed as teachers, doctors, and other occupations, or married to tribal members. Further, due to the allotment of communal tribal lands<\/a>, some non-Indian families have lived within a reservation for over a century, on lands the tribe does not own, precluding exclusion. Finally, the federal government and tribes have granted rights-of-way within their reservations for public highways. Non-members with no connection to the tribe at all may then enter and travel on the reservation\u2019s highways, and the tribe has no legal right to exclude them <\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The lack of clear, compact boundaries further complicates enforcement. Some tribal lands lie outside formal reservations in islands surrounded by state, federal, and private lands, creating a \u201ccheckerboard\u201d<\/a> of land statuses. A tribal public health order may then apply on one parcel, but not on the adjacent one<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Further, some reservations are adjacent to non-Indian \u201cborder towns.<\/a>\u201d The Nation, and other remote reservations, often lack significant numbers of grocery and other retail stores provided by border towns, which incentivizes tribal members to travel off the reservation. Often these communities, such as Gallup, New Mexico, also allow the sale of alcohol<\/a> when the tribe does not. Travel to and from those towns<\/a> has increased the spread of the virus and the tribes have no control over whether border towns honor tribal closure orders by closing businesses or restricting alcohol sales<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Because of these issues, tribes are at a disadvantage when issuing public health orders. While states apply their general police powers to all people present in their borders, tribes must constantly fight for legitimacy when doing the same<\/a>. For some tribes like the Nation, there is very little non-Indian owned land within the reservation, and non-Indians residing there are a small minority<\/a> who are unlikely to successfully challenge tribal public health orders. However, those tribes may still have issues restricting access on state highways<\/a> within their reservations, and lack any direct ability to enforce orders in border communities<\/a>. For other tribes where non-members own their own lands and may be a majority of the reservation<\/a> population, public health orders may be even more difficult to enforce.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Whether through the power to exclude, Montana<\/em>\u2019s exceptions, or both, tribal nations should have the authority<\/a> to restrict movement of anyone within their territory, even on state public highways, especially during a pandemic. As COVID-19 presents a \u201ccatastrophic\u201d threat to many tribal communities, tribes can exert the maximum scope of their powers. If non-members challenge such authority, tribes should not hesitate to enforce their orders and defend their actions in tribal and federal court, as the stakes are too high to accept a narrow conception of tribal sovereignty. Given the practical and legal complexities, tribes might also attempt to work with surrounding governments<\/a> to honor tribal orders,  assist in enforcing them<\/a>, and collaborate on cross-jurisdictional responses<\/a> to the virus (additional sources on file with author). Through these various approaches, tribes can maximize their resources to fight the pandemic and protect all people within their communities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Paul Spruhan is Assistant Attorney General for the Litigation Unit of the Navajo Department of Justice. He lives with his wife and two children in Fort Defiance, Arizona, on the Navajo Nation.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

There has been much press coverage on the Navajo Nation\u2019s struggle to contain the spread of COVID-19 on its lands. As of May 2, 2020, the Nation has 2,373 confirmed cases, and more than seventy deaths from the virus. These reports have noted the practical impediments the Nation faces in responding to the pandemic, including a high population of people with pre-existing health problems, the lack of easy access to health care, and the significant number of families without running…<\/p>\n

Read More Read More<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":107,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[122,194],"tags":[114,111,193,190,189,140,191,192],"class_list":["post-1383","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-covid-19","category-other-issues","tag-coronavirus","tag-covid-19","tag-exclude","tag-navajo","tag-navajo-nation","tag-pandemic","tag-sovereign-indian-tribe","tag-tribal-lands"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9jSvD-mj","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1404,"url":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?p=1404","url_meta":{"origin":1383,"position":0},"title":"South Dakota\u2019s COVID-19 Response is a Battleground for Tribal Sovereignty","author":"Anastasia O'Hara","date":"May 14, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"In a May 5 post Assistant Attorney General for the Navajo Nation Department of Justice Paul Spruhan argued that Indian tribes should have authority to restrict movement through their territories in order to stem the tide of the COVID-19 epidemic. Those very principles are now being put to the test\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Constitutional Issues"","block_context":{"text":"Constitutional Issues","link":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?cat=134"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1287,"url":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?p=1287","url_meta":{"origin":1383,"position":1},"title":"Prisons in the time of COVID-19","author":"Jenny Carroll","date":"April 16, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"The current COVID-19 public health crisis has rendered the nation\u2019s jails and prisons ticking time bombs. In the confined spaces of the carceral system the infection flourishes. At Rikers Island in New York City the rate of infection among the incarcerated population is an estimated seven times that of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "COVID-19"","block_context":{"text":"COVID-19","link":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?cat=122"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1408,"url":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?p=1408","url_meta":{"origin":1383,"position":2},"title":"COVID-19 Phobias About Health, Finances, Law, Leadership, and Loneliness","author":"Peter Huang","date":"May 15, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"COVID-19 is not just a medical and physical health pandemic; it has also led to interrelated phobias concerning health, finances, law, leadership, and loneliness. These interconnected phobias feed off each other and can alter a person\u2019s decision-making, risk perception, and self-identity. They also create and increase anxious feelings in sufferers.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Congressional Responses"","block_context":{"text":"Congressional Responses","link":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?cat=160"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1498,"url":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?p=1498","url_meta":{"origin":1383,"position":3},"title":"Access to Public Lands During the COVID-19 Pandemic","author":"Kellen Zale","date":"June 25, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"In an effort to reduce the risk of transmission of COVID-19, federal, state, and local governments have acted to limit or entirely close off access to public outdoor spaces, such as local playgrounds and state and national parks. As the country begins to reopen, governments have sought to balance the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Congressional Responses"","block_context":{"text":"Congressional Responses","link":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?cat=160"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1412,"url":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?p=1412","url_meta":{"origin":1383,"position":4},"title":"Korematsu in the Age of COVID \u2013 A Note on The Constitution in Times of Crisis","author":"Ariana Helena Aboulafia","date":"May 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"The case of Korematsu v. United States lives in constitutional infamy as the case which upheld the military policy of Japanese internment during WWII. In doing so, the Court\u2014led by former KKK member Justice Black\u2014did not deny that Japanese internment constituted a deprivation of constitutional rights. Instead, they found that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Constitutional Issues"","block_context":{"text":"Constitutional Issues","link":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?cat=134"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1451,"url":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?p=1451","url_meta":{"origin":1383,"position":5},"title":"Constitutional Constraints on Lawyer Licensing in the Age of COVID-19","author":"Collaboratory on Legal Education and Licensing for Practice","date":"June 3, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly disrupted the courts and the legal profession, just when access to justice is most needed. The public health crisis has generated a host of legal issues in areas as diverse as disaster relief, health law, disability issues, insurance, employment law, criminal justice, domestic violence, and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "COVID-19"","block_context":{"text":"COVID-19","link":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/?cat=122"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1383","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/107"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1383"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1383\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1383"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1383"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.northwesternlaw.review\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1383"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}