Browsed by
Category: Board member contribution

Time’s Up? The Barriers to Justice for Victims of Sexual Harassment

Time’s Up? The Barriers to Justice for Victims of Sexual Harassment

New Year, New Plan Three-hundred women from the film industry—including some of the most powerful women in Hollywood—began 2018 by announcing Time’s Up, a new plan to fight sexual assault, sexual harassment, and gender inequality. This came in the midst of a national conversation about sexual misconduct in the workplace following the numerous allegations against producer Harvey Weinstein and the emergence of the #MeToo movement. Part of the initiative includes the creation of the Legal Defense Fund, which will help minimize…

Read More Read More

Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands: Fashion Copyright in Vogue

Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands: Fashion Copyright in Vogue

“It would be a dangerous undertaking for persons trained only to the law to constitute themselves final judges of the worth of pictorial illustrations, outside of the narrowest and most obvious limits.” —Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographic Co. (1903) The fashion industry represents a multi-trillion dollar global business—casting a wide net and covering a range of industries from agriculture to manufacturing to design. It’s an industry almost every consumer engages with on a daily basis. Although it is…

Read More Read More

International Megan’s Law Raises Constitutional Concerns Over Sex Offender Rights

International Megan’s Law Raises Constitutional Concerns Over Sex Offender Rights

In the last months of his presidency, former President Barack Obama focused on pushing forward criminal justice reform. Throughout his eight years in the Oval Office, he also prioritized  “banning the box” on federal job applications and reforming conditions in federal prisons. Given his dedication to criminal justice reform, some have been perplexed by his signing of International Megan’s Law, which may violate sex offenders’ constitutional rights. President Obama signed the bill into law in February 2016 and it went…

Read More Read More

A North Carolina Case Deals Another Blow to Partisan Gerrymandering

A North Carolina Case Deals Another Blow to Partisan Gerrymandering

Gerrymandering, the practice of drawing electoral districts to advantage a particular political party, is under attack in courts across the country. The Supreme Court recently heard arguments in one case challenging the constitutionality of partisan gerrymandering and is scheduled to hear a second this Spring. Former Attorney General Eric Holder, with support from President Barack Obama, has embarked on a campaign to eliminate the practice. Last Monday, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania declared the state’s electoral maps to be in violation…

Read More Read More

South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc.: Supreme Court Will Decide the Fate of Online Sales Tax

South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc.: Supreme Court Will Decide the Fate of Online Sales Tax

Earlier this month, the Supreme Court agreed to hear South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. (S.D. 2017), a case that has the possibility to fundamentally change the circumstances in which online sales taxes must be collected, not only in South Dakota but nationwide. In Wayfair, South Dakota seeks to overturn Quill v. North Dakota, a 1992 Supreme Court ruling that South Dakota calls outdated. Quill involved an out-of-state office supply retailer that sold floppy disks without charging sales tax. The Quill Court held that a state…

Read More Read More

Nationwide Injunctions: City of Chicago v. Sessions and Class-wide Relief in Non-class Action Cases

Nationwide Injunctions: City of Chicago v. Sessions and Class-wide Relief in Non-class Action Cases

By Matthew Erickson On September 17, 2017, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois granted a preliminary injunction against the imposition of conditions the Trump administration placed on receipt of federal funds under a program known as the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program (the “Byrne JAG grant”). The case, City of Chicago v. Sessions, was the second major challenge to the Trump administration’s efforts to restrict funding from so-called “sanctuary cities” after the Northern District…

Read More Read More

Bachelor in Paradise? The Harsh Reality of Reality Television Contracts

Bachelor in Paradise? The Harsh Reality of Reality Television Contracts

This blog post previews my Note topic, The Harsh Reality of Reality Television Contracts, which explores whether principles of contract law and labor law can provide protection to reality television participants when things go wrong. On Sunday, June 4, 2017, the fourth season of Bachelor in Paradise began taping in Mexico. However, the reality was no paradise. News sources reported that a sexual encounter between a male and female contestant occurred while the cameras were rolling in which the female…

Read More Read More

The Seventh Circuit’s Admirable but Misguided Ruling on Transgender Discrimination

The Seventh Circuit’s Admirable but Misguided Ruling on Transgender Discrimination

The Seventh Circuit recently addressed discrimination issues involving a transgender student in a case of first impression, Whitaker v. Kenosha (2017), holding that a transgender student was protected by Title IX’s prohibition against sex-based discrimination. The court theorized that because transgender people do not conform to traditional stereotypes associated with their birth sex, transgender discrimination is nothing more than sex stereotyping, long prohibited by protections against sex discrimination. In essence, the court held that prohibiting a trans boy from using…

Read More Read More

Carpenter v. US: The Intersection of Law, Technology, and Privacy

Carpenter v. US: The Intersection of Law, Technology, and Privacy

Since Steve Jobs unveiled the legendary iPhone in 2007, smartphones have fundamentally changed countless aspects of human interaction from how we navigate to how we communicate. Today, over three-quarters of adults in the United States own a smartphone, making it one of the fastest spreading technologies of all time. The emergence of smartphones has also changed the way federal and local law enforcement agencies conduct investigations using data-collecting techniques that some argue infringe on our right to privacy. On November 29th,…

Read More Read More

New ABA Requirements Bring Changes to Law School Classrooms, Creating Opportunity, and Chaos

New ABA Requirements Bring Changes to Law School Classrooms, Creating Opportunity, and Chaos

Unbeknownst to many students J.D. and L.L.M. students, our classroom experiences are embarking upon a long-term path toward what could be significant changes as a trio of ABA requirements for law schools nationwide begin to take effect. The requirements are Standards 302, 314, and 315 , each of which defines a new type of requirement: learning outcomes (302), assessments (314), and global evaluations of these (315). According to Christopher M. Martin, Assistant Dean and Clinical Assistant Professor at Northwestern Pritzker School of…

Read More Read More